Starbucks Day of Action Special Edition Oxford professor, Douglas Holt blasts Starbucks’ argument as disingenuous and patronizing in this commentary on the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, the main daily newspaper in Seattle. "Perceptions that Starbucks works hard to benefit its poor coffee farmers have become a valuable part of the Starbucks brand for the company's customers. But when it comes to making the tough decisions, between caring and profit, does Starbucks really care? Starbucks claims that awarding trademarks would violate the economic interests of Ethiopian coffee growers. That is a disingenuous and patronizing argument. Starbucks opposes Ethiopia's efforts in order to shore up its market power, not out of paternal concern for Africans. It's not for Starbucks to deny Ethiopians the right to participate in the marketplace with the same legal rights that have allowed Starbucks to prosper. Trademarks would allow Sidamo, Harar, and Yirgacheffe to be managed by thei...