By Luis
F. Samper and Xiomara F. Quiñones-Ruiz
CONCLUSION
The
debate over how to best achieve sustainability in general and in the coffee
industry in particular is wide open. The coffee industry has been the leader in
implementing VSS, influencing other industries along the way. Certainly,
literature shows that positive effects have been identified since VSS started.
However, the time has come to re-evaluate the current model, not with the
objective of doing away with what it has achieved, but to look for new ways to
approach sustainability and obtain a bigger and wider effect that more closely
reflects the complex reality of coffee growing.
Available
studies show that impact of the current model varies according to the specific
context. There is no “silver bullet” standard to improve sustainability
indicators. Furthermore, VSS has not altered the value chain governance. In
addition, it appears that VSS will have difficulty growing and achieving at a
larger scale as the business case for sustainability investment is becoming
more dubious from a grower’s perspective due to the reduced economic incentives
and excess supply of sustainable certified coffees.
Both the
industry and the coffee growing communities, as well as consumer and NGO
advocates have to come to terms and agree on what is important and a priority
for the sustainability of the coffee industry as a whole. A top-down/bottom-up
industry wide materiality assessment is urgently needed to focus on priorities,
build effective alliances, achieve scale and provide effective tools for
participation that can be adapted to different coffee growing realities. This
new approach will imply the development of sustainability KPIs for individual
coffee origins and the ability to provide farmers with economic upgrade
opportunities.
In the
current market context where single origin coffees are favored by third wave
market trend-setters, the new sustainability framework should leverage this
market opportunity by offering Origin coffees and GIs, leveraging
differentiation from below opportunities that provide value to both farmers and
downstream industry players by strengthening their quality and sustainability
attributes. Likewise, Origin sustainability manifestos developed based on the
experience of GRI, VSS, SAFA and/or SDG frameworks can become a useful tool to
provide origin differentiation and credible data for other value chain actors.
A desired competition on quality and sustainability can help to develop public
private partnerships and long-term cooperation with those marketing given
origins.
This
origin-centric inclusive sustainability strategy will provide more authentic
and credible content to consumers and stakeholders and upgrade opportunities to
all, not limiting the system to convey differentiation opportunities for the
marketing and distribution end of the value chain. As the model provides for
regional differentiation, it coexists with and learns from the successful
farm-specific and direct trade value creation processes that the third wave
coffee segment has successfully positioned. It also reduces the implicit delocalization
risks that are part of the VSS model. Consistent with the sustainable market
transformation theory, it has the benefits of scale as whole origins are
marketed and positioned. Lastly, it gives positive incentives for all supply
chain actors that can create value along the chain.
***********
Full
article is stored at https://www.scribd.com/document/359243886/Towards-a-Balanced-Sustainability-Vision-for-the-Coffee-Industry
No comments:
Post a Comment
Join the conversation