November
16, 2011
![]() |
Picture: Courtesy of Good Magazine
|
On a
rainy Wednesday afternoon in Venice, California, Dan Kougan spreads out three
shot glasses in front of a curious audience. The champagne-colored liquid
bubbling on the left is a homemade hops soda. The creamy, tan shot in the
middle is a barley-chocolate malt topped with a tuft of steamed milk. And the
chestnut-hued beverage on the right, the raison d’ĂȘtre of this whole ordeal,
gives off the unmistakable scent of fresh espresso, extracted from the
highest-quality coffee beans the developing world has to offer.
“Thanks,
Dan, I’m really excited!” says Elaine Levia. She smiles as she eyes the Flight
of Three—the name given to the triptych of shot glasses on the glass-top bar
before her. “Do you have drinking instructions?” she asks.
Of
course he does. For a month, Kougan has been planning the details of each
beverage for his hops-themed menu. It’s his week to curate the Slow Bar, the
backspace of the coffee shop Intelligentsia, where baristas take turns
designing and executing a custom menu. The venue is part laboratory, part
classroom, and part theater. Coffee groupies sit on bleacherlike benches in a
precaffeinated state of awe, waiting for a barstool to open up.
Sip
from lightest to darkest, instructs Kougan. “The hops will kind of ramp up in
bitterness and effervescence. And then the chocolate malt will curb that
flavor, and the espresso will take it back up.”
Levia
complies. The coffee alchemy works its magic. “Absolutely phenomenal,” she
says. As a fellow barista at the shop, she’s no stranger to the Slow Bar’s
signature blend of high-quality espresso—from a refurbished 1972 La Marotta
machine— and baroque flourishes. During her week as curator, Levia opted for a
“vintage coffee experience,” pairing each brew with a different bite-sized
pastry. “It turned into a focus on the drinkware, actually,” she admits. “I
served Turkish coffee in Moka pots and tried to make it really, like, ’50s
housewife style.” She laughs. “With Fiesta ware.” Another barista highlighted
alternative milks—from macadamias, cashews, and Brazil nuts.
The
idea of the Slow Bar is to “give the customer an experience that expands their
idea of what coffee is,” says Charles Babinski, who trains the staff in
different brewing techniques and hosts educational events for customers. It’s a
place where customers can sit down and ask questions about coffee, but it’s
“not meant to be beating people over the heads with education as much as just
creating different coffee experiences.”
“Customer
education” and “coffee experiences” are terms you hear a lot when talking to
the roasters and baristas who make up the ultra-high-end coffee movement, a
trend that’s been percolating for the past decade. If you visit a shop like
Intelligentsia—or Blue Bottle in San Francisco or Stumptown in Portland or
Third Rail Coffee in New York City—you’ll encounter a staff eager to discuss
the distinct regional characteristics (or terroir) and flavor profile of each
coffee on the menu, sourced from a handful of elite farms known as “microlots”
in places like El Salvador, Kenya, and Indonesia. You’ll be encouraged to try a
cup of lightly roasted, brewed coffee, which had become all but passé with the
Starbucks-backed ascendancy of dark roasts, espressos, and lattes in the late
1990s. You’ll look on as a brewer takes several minutes to unleash a stream of
boiling water from a silver kettle into a cone full of coffee grounds—the
meticulous process behind every mug of individually brewed “pour over”
coffee—to unlock the beverage’s most subtle flavors.
But
perhaps the most memorable part of the experience comes at the register: a cool
$5 for an unadorned cup of brewed coffee. And that’s if the bean is more
common. This fall, a cup of Intelligentsia’s Kenya Tegu was selling for $6.50.
“Ethereal and luminous,” a description on the company’s website reads. “Lychee,
persimmon and botanical notes bring a weightlessness to the muscular and
expansive Tegu. Marmalade and sweet herbs float in the background while the
finish hangs onto a hint of spice.”
“We think
our coffee is ridiculously cheap,” says Ben Kaminsky, director of quality
control at Ritual Roasters in San Francisco, where a pound of beans starts at
$19.95. His sentiment is echoed by many working in high-end coffee. “It’s
interesting to me that the same consumer that will go to 7-11 and buy a bottle
of Fiji Water for five dollars will go crazy and complain about a cup of
coffee,” says Geoff Watts, Intelligentsia’s vice president and green
(unroasted, that is) coffee buyer. “This is a meticulously grown agricultural
product from halfway around the world that was hand-harvested, hand-picked, and
roasted and brewed. It’s got all these different flavor characteristics. It’s
got antioxidants. It’s got all the things you could want in a drink.”
A
luxury drink, that is. “Coffee as cheap fuel for the masses is a historical
anomaly,” says Peter Giuliano, director of coffee at the North Carolina-based
roaster Counter Culture. “There’s no nutritive value. It’s drunk just for the
pleasure of it. It’s a total miracle of global agriculture, a feat that spans
cultures and countries.”
Mother
Nature might be on the side of Giuliano and his cohorts. At the exact moment
that rare beans are becoming all the rage, all beans are becoming rarer. The
price of a cup of coffee—whether it be a $6 pour-over, a $2.50 dark roast at
Starbucks, or a $1.50 mug of diner swill—is being driven up by a complex
combination of weather events, pest and fungus outbreaks, speculation on
commodities exchanges, an unstable labor market in the developing world, and an
unprecedented thirst for good coffee among a growing global middle class. The
problem, in simple economic terms, is that supply has gone down and demand has
gone up.
“We’re
going back to where coffee began,” Giuliano says, “as an exotic, beloved
culinary experience.”
* * *
Arabica,
the strain of coffee that makes up most of the world’s supply, is a notoriously
fickle organism, “the Barbra Streisand of plants: a diva,” as coffee writer
Taylor Clark told The New York Times. To develop the complex flavors that drive
coffee nerds wild, the best beans demand a lot from their surroundings:
tropical climates with warm, sunny days that fade into chilly evenings;
altitudes between 1,800 and 2,400 meters; copious rains at certain times of the
year; dry spells at others. Low-quality Arabica is abundant throughout
low-lying regions of Brazil, where one-third of all coffee comes from. But just
a few regions on Earth are hospitable to such a needy guest as the world’s best
beans, which grow only in the high peaks of the tropics in East Africa, Central
and South America, and Southeast Asia.
The
delicate balance in those ecosystems is being thrown off kilter. In Colombia,
the world’s third-biggest coffee producer, agricultural scientist Peter Baker
has watched while record rainfall, increased heat, and frequent plagues have
devastated farms across the country’s Andean coffee- growing region. It was
2005 when Baker “started to think seriously that climate change was not just
about the future but was already happening.” Today, the signs are plentiful.
Average temperatures have risen nearly 2 degrees in some areas over the past 30
years, “especially nighttime minimum temperatures,” says Baker, “a tell-tale
signature of [man-made] climate change.” Hotter, rainier weather nourishes
pests and disease, particularly coffee rust, a fungal plague that’s ascended
Colombia’s mountain peaks, which were formerly too chilly for the organism.
Heavy rains damage Arabica’s delicate blossoms—the same blossoms that
eventually turn into coffee cherries, whose seeds are coffee beans. As heat and
pests climb Colombia’s mountains, “the lower limit at which coffee is grown is
starting to go up,” says Baker. As growers move higher into the mountains, they
run into another problem: mountains have tops.
“Over
the last four or five years nearly every farmer in every country I work with
has experienced climate events that they’ve described as completely out of
whack,” says Watts, who helped found Intelligentsia in Chicago 16 years ago.
“And these are people that have been growing coffee on those farms for 20, 30,
40 years. ... They’re seeing rain when they had droughts before; they’re seeing
droughts when they usually have a lot of rain. They’re seeing hail and frost in
places where it didn’t exist before.” Extreme weather events “are happening
simultaneously in every part of the coffee-growing world,” he adds.
The
result? Between 2006 and 2009, the Colombian yield shrank by a quarter—from 12
million bags to 7.8 million, the lowest yield in 33 years. The forecast doesn’t
look good for the rest of the coffee-growing world, either: more pests in East
Africa, more hurricanes in Central America, more droughts in Indonesia. Global
coffee stockpiles are close to record lows. “There is simply not enough coffee
in the world,” Jose Sette, now the former executive director of the International
Coffee Organization, told Bloomberg in February. Combine this with other
economic realities—the rising cost of fertilizer and the fact that young
people, bound for the cities, aren’t following in their parents’ coffee-growing
footsteps—and you can understand the term that Peter Baker has coined as a
warning: “peak coffee.” Just like with oil, the world is maxing out the volume
of coffee it can sustain.
Now
Baker is trying to come up with “a toolbox of different methods” to help
farmers cope with the rising temperature. But he says that researchers are only
in the “early stages of thinking about what we can do for farmers that’s
practical. At the moment a lot of people are taking measurements and looking at
models and mapping out likely changes.” A game-changing solution, like
developing heat-tolerant hybrids, for example, will take at least 10 to 15
years, says Tim Schilling, executive director of the Global Coffee Quality
Research Initiative.
While
climate change’s harshest effects won’t be felt for two or three more decades,
“it would not surprise me if one of these years we get a fairly serious
drought” in a major coffee-producing country like Brazil, Baker says. “That
could cause coffee scarcity for quite a prolonged period.” Coffee production will
continue to experience booms and busts, but Baker asserts that “in the long
run, people will have to get used to drinking a bit less coffee.”
Or
paying a lot more for it.
* * *
Not
long ago, coffee growers had the opposite problem. Coffee was dirt cheap and
about as plentiful. In the late 1980s, the Reagan administration was beating
the free-trade drum, and the global financial community turned against the
protectionist policies of export-dependent economies. The coffee industry’s
quota system met its demise in 1989, and overproduction became an issue in the
1990s, particularly in Brazil and newcomer Vietnam, where the industry grew at
a breakneck, unregulated pace. At the turn of the millennium, supply often
exceeded consumption by 13 percent. From the 1980s to 2002, the global price of
coffee declined from a high of $2 a pound to less than 50 cents a pound—when
adjusted for inflation, the lowest price paid for coffee in a century. While
the value of coffee’s retail sales grew from $30 billion to $70 billion between
the early 1990s and 2005, the amount that trickled down to farmers declined
precipitously, from $11 billion to $5.5 billion, pushing many small growers
deeper into poverty.
Watts
calls the prices during that period “unsustainably low.” Farmers barely made
enough money to survive, let alone invest in the long-term viability of their
farms. Some growers even shifted focus: to pineapples in Costa Rica, soy in
Brazil, and livestock in Colombia (as well as drug crops like coca and poppy).
With
coffee supplies running short, prices escalated at a rapid clip, outpacing even
gasoline’s monumental ascent. Between spring 2010 and spring 2011, coffee
roughly doubled in price. On the futures exchange in New York City, the price
per pound crossed a frightening milestone—the $3 mark—hitting a three-decade
high on May 3, 2011. Peet’s Coffee, Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, and
Starbucks announced price hikes. Low-end grocery store staples followed suit.
Smuckers, the parent company of Folgers and Dunkin Donuts’ supermarket line,
announced an 11 percent price increase on all coffee products. Kraft raised
prices by 22 percent on brands like Maxwell House. Since spring, the
commodities market has calmed, and major brands have lowered prices slightly.
The
coffee industry has downplayed concerns that climate change is causing price
fluctuations. “I think at the end of the day, [climate change] could be a
canceling effect,” says Judy Ganes-Chase, a consultant to the coffee industry.
“It’s not like the world is going to freeze and suddenly can’t grow coffee
anymore.” In March of this year, Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz told Reuters that
speculators were to blame. There’s still plenty of chatter about climate in the
industry, though. “It’s one of the topics at almost any conference, because the
conference organizer puts it in there,” Ganes-Chase adds. “Is it having a
pronounced impact on the markets today? No. That’s a long-term factor.”
In the
meantime, high prices are putting the squeeze on big coffee companies’ efforts
to maintain quality. Low-end brands that run a volume game—think of instant
coffee, cheap diner coffee, or supermarket coffee— are likely to descend the
quality ranks even further. Rather than raise prices, they’re choosing to cut
their beans with older coffee, lower-quality Arabica (say, Brazilian instead of
Costa Rican beans), or Arabica’s ugly stepsister Robusta—cheaper, hardier stuff
grown on an industrial scale in Vietnam that packs even more of the caffeinated
jolt with none of the sensual complexity.
Small,
high-end companies are often better situated to cope with rising prices. “As
somebody that loves coffee, I’m happy to see the markup,” says Watts. “Prices
are finally at a place where it is very possible that a farmer can make money
and be profitable.” More revenue for farmers means more investment in the
quality and the sustainability of the product. Smaller roasters feel the
ripples of the price hikes coming off the commodities market, but they’re
insulated from them. They often negotiate prices directly with small growers or
buy coffee at local auctions. Not to mention, they’re already used to paying
huge premiums for rare coffees—five or even 10 times the price of the commodity
stuff. Cheap coffee is simply catching up. Still, rare and specialty coffee is
a “very, very, very small percentage” of the total industry, says Ganes-Chase.
“Who cares if it’s grown 300 percent? That means a cup a day. It’s still
small.”
The
lion’s share of coffee-shop joe is brewed from beans that coffee snobs might declare
“just ok.” In a retail setting, companies peddling high volumes of midgrade
beans face tough decisions as the price goes up. Skimp on quality, and an
increasingly savvy customer base will notice. Refuse to compromise, and
affordability goes out the window. According to Ganes-Chase, consumers might
notice cup sizes go down or muffin prices go up if retailers aren’t comfortable
charging more for their signature product. Coffee shops might bank on the fact
that a customer won’t quit her morning ritual because of a small price
increase; instead she’ll just “put less money in the tip jar for the barista,”
says Ganes-Chase.
There’s
one more option that midrange retailers are exploring, and it’s straight from
Intelligentsia’s playbook: Create a “coffee experience” so compelling that
customers won’t think twice about paying more.
* * *
Just
two miles southeast of Intelligentsia’s shop in Venice, there’s a strip mall in
Marina del Rey that’s home to a Starbucks. It’s one of the select, big-city
locations to pilot Starbucks Reserve, the corporation’s line of high-end,
single-origin coffees. “We see those trends in many independent shops, and I
think we’re delivering it to our consumer through the Starbucks Reserve
program,” says Dub Hay, Starbucks vice president for coffee. He says these
beans are “rare and exotic and special in a particular way.” (One particular
way is the packaging: “Exotic, Rare, Exquisite,” it reads.)
While
Starbucks will prepare pour-over coffee at some locations, the signature
technology behind the new product line is the Clover, an $11,000 contraption
that was hyped as a game changer when it came out in 2006. Baristas loved the
machine for the unprecedented level of control it gave over brewing conditions,
the high-tech aura surrounding the invention, and its ability to offer
delicious single servings of brewed coffee with the click of a button. With a
certain element of coffee porn—the Clover ejaculates used grounds at the climax
of its performance—“it made single-cup brewing sexy,” says Intelligentsia
educator Babinski.
Starbucks
was sold. “We think that’s the finest brewed cup of coffee you can make,” Hay
says. By 2007 the company was experimenting with a few Clovers in Seattle and
Boston. In 2008, it bought the startup that invented the technology, the Coffee
Equipment Company, and began testing the machine in more shops. While the
Clover had been a hit when it was used with lightly roasted beans, early
reviews of Starbucks’ Clover-brewed darker roasts were dismissive. One
taste-tester from The New York Times declared, “‘I hate it. That’s really
spoiled fruit, like really bad wine.’”
Since
then Starbucks has scoured the Earth for better beans and come up with bags of
stuff like Guatemala de Flor and Honduras Premier. The coffees, like their
crosstown counterparts at Intelligentsia, have terroir and flavor notes. “When
sampling these beans in our Seattle tasting room,” reads one bag, “a heady
lavender scent filled the air, transporting our buyer back to a coffee estate
in Guatemala’s Antigua valley.” The cashier in Marina del Rey describes the
brew as “bold.” A half-pound sack retails for $15, about twice as much as
Starbucks’ standard fare.
The
reaction of the high-end marketplace is mixed. Intelligentsia—which consulted
on the Clover’s design, according to Babinski— ditched the gadget after
Starbucks’ acquisition. Babinski says that while it made great coffee,
Intelligentsia is more interested in manual techniques and educating the
consumer about replicating them at home. “There’s nothing a brewer can do to
add quality. That quality is in the bean itself,” says Babinksi, who also
criticizes the Clover’s rushed brew time and inefficient use of coffee grounds.
“I
think it would be awesome if Starbucks started doing more and more specialty
coffee things,” Babinski says. “But I dunno ... .” He is not one to talk down about
coffee, but when he hears that the Reserve line includes Jamaica Blue Mountain
coffee, he cringes. “It’s a brand,” he says. “That’s not something I
necessarily associate with quality.”
The
real issue, it would seem, is scale. Starbucks is so large that it’s not
possible for every employee to be passionate about coffee. “This isn’t
something that you can just do,” Babinski says of Intelligentsia’s dedication
to quality. “I never worked in a coffee shop in my life where there’s this much
of a collection of totally dedicated coffee professionals who are absolutely
psyched to come to work every day,” he says. Indeed, this is how high-end
companies will always be able to differentiate themselves, even as big coffee
tries to catch up in the quality game. Coffee technologies and exotic beans can
be commoditized, but true coffee geeks are a rare breed.
In
Marina del Rey, the menu of Starbucks Reserve coffees hangs to the left of a
sign announcing the return of fall drinks including the Salted-Caramel Mocha
and the Pumpkin-Spice Latte. The Clover, a big black box with a faucet sticking
out of it, sits behind a piece of glass to shield it from sneezing customers. A
barista begins to brew a grande cup of the Guatemala for $4.45, a couple
dollars more than the regular brew. The barista grinds the coffee, weighs it on
a balance, dumps it into the shoot, and irrigates it with a hot water drip. The
coffee disappears inside the machine, and shortly after, you can hear the sound
of brewed coffee squirting into a paper cup.
The
Guatemala is piping hot and a rich black. The notes of lavender are there. But
the barista who made it says it’s not her favorite of the Reserve coffees. In
fact, she doesn’t have one. “I don’t really drink brewed coffee,” she says.
“I’m more of a tea person.”

No comments:
Post a Comment
Join the conversation